Recommendation movement
Compare the same buyer questions before and after a change. Track answers that explicitly recommend your brand, and keep that separate from a simple brand mention.
Start with your website, then add one question a customer would really ask AI — for example, “what’s the best tool for making 3D models?”
Free includes one complete first diagnostic for one website project, a site-wide Markdown plan, GEO Profile draft, and website baseline. It does not include rescans, history, custom monitored questions, complete exports, or article generation. Your report is private to your account by default and is not published as a case study without permission.
20
Tested 20 buyer questions
120
Saved 120 AI answers
196
Reviewed 196 cited sources
10
Prioritized 10 next actions
Illustration only. Your own scan and rechecks supply the actual values.
AI visibility audits across major answer engines
Many teams do not need a vague GEO pitch. They need one buyer question checked. Send your website, the question, and the competitors you keep seeing, then use the same context in the diagnostic.
No full brief required.
Scope from a real domain.
Check once, fix a page, or track changes.
How do I know the work is helping?
Recheck the same buyer questions after a change ships. This separates recommendation, mention, cited-source, and real business signals instead of treating them as one vague visibility score.
Compare the same buyer questions before and after a change. Track answers that explicitly recommend your brand, and keep that separate from a simple brand mention.
Check whether your pages or trusted sources appear more often in the same answers, and whether competitors still win those questions. CiteRank keeps the answer and source evidence behind the comparison.
If your GSC, analytics, or Microsoft Clarity setup identifies AI referrals, compare AI-origin visits, landing pages, leads, or conversions. CiteRank does not read those accounts automatically.
These are measurement signals, not a fixed-growth guarantee. AI answers, category demand, site authority, third-party coverage, and recrawl timing can all affect the result.
Six questions CiteRank answers for you
CiteRank connects your product facts, buyer questions, AI answers, cited sources, and page gaps. The output is a plain-language report plus a ranked list of next steps.
We test real buyer questions and show whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, or DeepSeek mention your brand, your competitors, or nobody useful.
We compare AI claims with your website and flag incorrect or missing details about features, price, ideal users, use cases, and limitations.
We group the questions buyers actually ask AI by use case, comparison, price concern, and purchase stage.
We list the pages, directories, reviews, docs, and community sources that AI answers cite, then show where competitors appear and you do not.
For each important gap, we point to the page to update and the answer, facts, comparison, FAQ, schema, source, or proof it still needs.
We keep the same question set and recheck it after changes ship, so progress is measured instead of guessed.
How it works
Start with the same buyer questions and evidence. Recheck them after fixes ship so each change can be measured instead of debated.
Add one website project. For a free first check, start with one buyer question; for ongoing monitoring, keep up to 20 active questions in that same project.
We test how AI answers describe your category, which brands they mention, which sources they cite, and which buyer paths you are missing.
You receive a prioritized list of page fixes, source gaps, and follow-up checks. After a change ships, the same questions show whether recommendation, mention, or citation evidence moved.
GEO Profile and channel consistency
AI systems and buyers build an understanding of your brand from your website, structured data, directories, reviews, social profiles, and external articles. When those facts conflict, it becomes harder to know who you serve and which claims to trust. CiteRank drafts an editable GEO Profile, lets you correct and approve it, then uses it to keep pages, articles, guest posts, and public profiles consistent.
We flag conflicts using publicly verifiable information. Your strategy, target customer, and core positioning still require your approval; CiteRank does not invent brand facts for you.
The $299 one-time foundation drafts and lets you approve the profile before page upgrades. $499/$999 add public-channel corrections and ongoing maintenance on top.
See the brand consistency serviceClarify what the product is, who it serves, the problem it solves, the result it delivers, and why buyers should choose it.
Compare the website, schema, public social profiles, directories, reviews, and other discoverable mentions for outdated or conflicting facts.
Show which description, category, audience, claim, URL, or proof should be corrected on each channel, then recheck the important surfaces.
From Signal To Action
Practical GEO work is simple: understand the product, test buyer questions, read the answers, find cited sources, fix the gaps, then recheck. CiteRank keeps those pieces connected.
Complete scan capabilities
These checks are included in the complete CiteRank scan. They are not separate tools.
Find missing facts, direct answers, comparisons, FAQs, and source evidence
Open diagnosticCheck whether robots rules and page signals make your website harder to read
Open diagnosticSee which competitors AI recommends and which sources support the answer
Open diagnosticGet the page or evidence fix that should be addressed first
Open diagnosticGrounded in real citation data
Basic monitoring stops at scores and mentions. CiteRank also shows why competitors appear, which sources AI cites, and exactly which page and section you should change.
We use the repeatedly cited pages to identify which answer, fact, comparison, FAQ, and crawlable sections are worth applying to other pages.
The strongest page combined direct answer blocks, structured facts, comparisons, FAQ coverage, and crawlable formatting.
For each selected URL, the $299 service explains what to add, rewrite, support with sources, and recheck.
Pricing
$99 Starter keeps up to 20 active questions in one website project and rechecks the same evidence weekly. The $299 one-time service gives exact page changes. $499 and $999 add monthly priority improvement, live checks, and rechecks so the before-and-after change can be judged.
Every plan starts from AI answer evidence. Higher plans add people to prepare, check, and recheck the changes.
For one website project that wants repeatable evidence instead of one-off guesses.
For a team that can publish changes but needs us to choose the pages, prepare the changes, and verify the result.
With Pro we hand your team the plan to ship. With Managed we do the work and you just hit publish.
Do not need a subscription?
The $299 offer is not a middle subscription tier. It is a one-time service that checks the evidence and explains exactly how to improve the highest-priority existing pages. It usually covers 3-5 pages, with exact scope set by the diagnostic.
We first draft the brand positioning and fact foundation that every future page and public profile should follow, then apply the approved direction to the most important existing pages.
Service boundary: publishing, external outreach, and paid purchases are proposed with scope and cost, then performed only after your approval.
FAQ
CiteRank shows where AI search recommends your competitors instead of you. It tests real buyer questions, captures answer evidence, lists the sources AI uses, and tells you what to fix first.
Traditional SEO tools track Google rankings. CiteRank checks AI answers and shows whether AI systems mention your brand, recommend competitors, or cite sources where you are missing.
The free first check uses ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. Paid monitoring and the complete paid audit can check all six supported platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek. Copilot is not currently scanned.
CiteRank connects each missing recommendation to evidence: the competitor that appeared, the sources supporting the answer, the owned page that needs work, and the next fix to test. Higher plans add page-by-page rewrite work and implementation review.
$99 Starter monitors one website project with up to 20 active buyer questions across six AI platforms, complete evidence, weekly rechecks, alerts, and CSV export. The one-time $299 service first drafts your brand positioning profile, then applies it to exact changes for 3-5 priority pages, plus 30 days of Starter Monitoring. $499 Pro runs two expert optimization rounds each month, turning the highest-impact issues into publishable page and content changes, reviewing your team's work before it goes live, and retesting the same questions after launch. $999 Managed runs four optimization rounds a month on top of Pro, keeps your website, structured data, and public profiles consistent, and delivers a monthly before-and-after report.
It is the maximum number of active questions kept in one monitored website project at the same time. We run the same active set on the paid recheck schedule. You can edit, replace, or stop a question; adding a new one after the limit requires removing or replacing an old one.
Yes. Starter covers one website project at a time: one brand, one monitored site URL, its buyer questions, evidence, and rechecks. A second website needs a separate project or plan scope; it is not silently included under the first project.
Use the same buyer questions before and after publishing. First compare explicit recommendations, then simple mentions, cited pages and sources, and which competitors still win. If your GSC, analytics, or Microsoft Clarity setup identifies AI referrals, use AI-origin visits, landing pages, leads, or conversions as an external business signal. CiteRank does not automatically read those accounts, and no fixed lift is guaranteed.
You receive an editable GEO Profile draft covering the category, audience, problem, outcome, mechanism, differentiation, claims, proof, and canonical descriptions. We review it with you and use the approved source of truth to prepare the target buyer question, direct-answer copy, structured facts, comparison and use-case sections, FAQ and schema guidance, source and proof gaps, internal-link notes, and a same-question recheck plan for 3-5 selected pages. The service also includes 30 days of Starter Monitoring for the same website.
We commit to testing the agreed buyer questions, preserving the original answers and sources, selecting priority pages from evidence, delivering publishable changes, checking the live implementation, and repeating the same questions on schedule. Citation volume can still vary with category demand, existing authority, third-party coverage, competitor activity, and recrawl timing, so we show before-and-after evidence instead of promising a fixed number.
The free diagnostic appears after the first scan finishes. Paid monitoring keeps the same buyer-question set on a weekly recheck cycle so changes can be judged over time.
Yes. We show which competitor appears for each buyer question, what sources support that answer, and which gaps are realistic to fix first.
No. You share your website and competitors. The report explains the findings in plain language and turns them into next steps your team can understand.
Yes. Starter Monitoring is $99/month and can be canceled anytime. The $299 GEO Foundation + AI Page Upgrade is a separate one-time purchase.
Start with one complete diagnostic for free: see whether AI recommends you, who it trusts, download the site-wide plan, and review your GEO Profile draft.